The purpose of the study was to test individual differences in sensory sensitivity while performing signal detection and signal discrimination tasks. A total of 98 subjects performed two cognitive style tests on flexibility and rigidity of cognitive control, and focusing and scanning control, as well as two psychophysical tasks on visual signal detection (“yes/no” method) and loudness discrimination (“same/different”), each including two difficulty levels. Task type and difficulty level were considered as stimulation factors, and cognitive styles were considered as individual differences factors. The effects of both cognitive styles along with the effect of their interaction were revealed. ‘Flexible’ subjects and ‘scanners’ showed higher sensitivity in signal detection compared to ‘rigid’ subjects and ‘focusers’, respectively. Whereas no between-group differences were found in the accuracy of signal discrimination. Thus, we revealed individual differences in sensitivity, driven by cognitive style characteristics on the one hand, and task type on the other.

Gusev Aleksei Nikolaevich, Doctor of Sciences (Psychology), Professor, Psychology of Personality, Lomonosov Moscow State University, 1, Leninskie Gory, Moscow, 119991, Russian Federation, e-mail: angusev@mail.ru

Volkova Nataliia Nikitichna, Manager, Sberbank, 19, Vavilov st., Moscow,117997,Russian Federation, e-mail: n.volkova.psy@gmail.com

Gusev A.N., Volkova N.N. Сognitive Style Differences in Detection and Discrimination of Sensory Signals. The Bulletin of Irkutsk State University. Series Psychology, 2021, vol. 35, pp. 22-28. https://doi.org/10.26516/2304-1226.2021.35.22

Gardner R.W., Holzman P.S., Klein G.S., Linton H.B., Spence D.P. Cognitive control: a study of individual consistencies in cognitive behavior. Psychological Issues. Monograph 4. N.Y., International Universities Press, 1959, pp. 1-117.

Kozhevnikov M. Cognitive styles in the context of modern psychology: toward an integrated framework of cognitive style. Psychological Bulletin, 2007, vol. 133, no. 3, pp, 464-481.

Miyake A., Friedman N.P., Emerson M.J., Witzki A.H., Howerter A., Wager T.D. The unity and diversity of executive functions and their contributions to complex «frontal lobe» tasks: A latent variable analysis. Cognitive psychology, 2002, vol. 41, no. 1, pp. 49-100.

Skotnikova I., Gusev A. Subject-oriented psychophysics of sensory tasks. Fechner Day 2016: proceedings of the 32nd Annual Meeting of the International Society for Psychophysics. Moscow, Inst. of psychology RAS Publ., 2016, p. 16. (in Russian)

Stroop J.R. Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1935, vol. 18, no. 6, pp. 643-662. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0054651

Wackermann J. Universality versus individuality: Place for inter-individual differences? Fechner Day 2014. Proceedings of the 30th Annual Meeting of the International Society for Psychophysics. Lund, Sweden, 2014, pp. 67.