ISSN 2304-1226 (Print)

List of issues > Series «Psychology». 2018. Vol. 26

The Influence of Situational Factors on Decision-Making in Alternative Single-Choice Task

A. P. Karabanov

Current study rises a problem of decision-making under uncertainty, in particular the impact of two situational factors – hypothetiaclity and availability of choice results. We hypothesized that the influence of those factors may decrease the risk-avoidance tendency via lessen the affectiveness of a task. On material of the task modelling decision-making in sports betting, the evidence of the impact of hypotheticality of a situation on decreasing the risk-avoidance tendency was obtained. Generally safe choices dominated in the sample, but hypothetiaclity of a situation increased the proportion of risky choices. The second hypothesis about similar effect of availabilityof choice results wasn't confirmed. Three explanatory mechanisms of the observed effect were suggested. In conclusion the discrepancy between real and retrospective choices of novice betters that could be regarded as a possible reason of gambling behaviour were mentioned.

About the Authors

Karabanov Artem Petrovich, Lecturer, Department of Differential Psychology and Psychophysiology, Russian State University for Humanities, 6, Miusskaya sq., GSP-3, Moscow, 125993, Russian Federation, e-mail: pacaraban01@gmail.com

For citation

Karabanov A. P. The Influence of Situational Factors on Decision-Making in Alternative Single-Choice Task. The Bulletin of Irkutsk State University. Series Psychology, 2018, vol. 26, pp. 43-52. https://doi.org/10.26516/2304-1226.2018.26.43 (in Russian)

decision-making, hypothetical choice, probability representation, risky choice, heuristics

Blyagoz Z.U., Popova A.Yu. Prinyatie reshenii v usloviyakh riska i neopredelennosti [Decision-making under risk and uncertainty]. Vestnik Adygeiskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta [The Bulletin of Adyghe State University], 2006, vol. 4, pp. 164-168. (in Russian)

Karabanov A.P. Vliyanie vremennoi lokalizatsii sobyatiya na otsenku ego veroyatnosti kak faktor prinyatiya reshenii [Time Localization Impact on Evaluation of the Event Probability as a Decision-Making Factor]. Vestnik YarGU im. P.G. Demidova. Seriya Gumanitarnye Nauki [The Dulletin of P.G. Demidov Yaroslavl State University. Series Humanities], 2017a, vol. 3(41), pp. 103-106. (in Russian)

Karabanov A.P. Vliyanie vremennoi lokalizatsii problemy na aktivatsiyu implitsitnykh mekhanizmov snizheniya neopredelennosti pri prinyatii reshenii [Time Localization Bias towards Implicit Mechanisms of Uncertainty Overcoming Activation in Decision-Making]. Novoe v psikhologo-pedagogicheskikh issledovaniyakh [Innovation in Psychological and Pedagogical Studies], 2017b, vol. 3(47), pp. 68-73. (in Russian)

Malyutina T.D. Metody prinyatiya upravlencheskikh reshenii pri raznykh urovnyakh neopredelennosti [Methods of making managerial decisions on different levels of uncertainty]. Upravlenie Ekonomicheskimi Sistemami [Managment of Economic Systems], 2013, vol. 12(60), p. 19. (in Russian)

Brandstätter E., Gigerenzer G., Hertwig R. The priority heuristic: Choices without tradeoffs. Psychological Review, 2006, vol. 113(2), pp. 409-432.

Cosmides L., Tooby J. Are humans good intuitive statisticians after all? Rethinking some conclusions from the literature on judgement under uncertainty. Cognition, 1996, vol. 58(1), pp. 1-73.

Gigerenzer G. How to make cognitive illusions disappear: beyond heuristics and biases. European Review of Social Psychology, 1991, vol. 2(1), pp. 83-115.

Hammond K.R. Functionalism and Illusionism: Can integration be usefully achieved? In Hogarth R.M. (ed.). Insights in decision making: A tribute to Hillel J. Einhorn. Chicago: University of Chicago, 1990, 370 p.

Kahneman D., Tversky A. On the psychology of prediction. Psychological Review, 1973, vol. 80(4), pp. 237-251.

Laplace P.S. A philosophical essay on probabilities. N. Y. : Dover, 1951, 205 p. 

Loewenstein G., O'Donoghue T., Sudeep B. Modeling the interplay Between Affect and Deliberation. Decision, 2015, vol. 2(2), pp. 55-81.

Pachur T., Hertwig R., Wolkewitz R. The Affect Gap in Risky Choice: Affect-rich outcomes attenuate attention to probability information. Decision, 2013, vol. 1(1), pp. 64-78.

Rottenstreich Y., Hsee C. K. Money, kisses, and electric shocks: On the affective psychology of risk. Psychological Science, 2001, vol. 12(3), pp. 185-190.

Shah A.K., Oppenheimer D.M. Heuristics made easy: An effort-reduction framework. Psychological Bulletin, 2008, vol. 134(2), pp. 207-222.

Full text (russian)