Список выпусков > Серия «Психология». 2022. Том 42
Процесс осознания значения с позиций концепции
позитивного и негативного выбора как способ
разрешения некоторых противоречий в моделях,
основанных на активационной гипотезе
Аллахвердов В. М. Опыт теоретической психологии. СПб. : Печатный двор, 1993. 325 с.
Аллахвердов В. М. Сознание как парадокс. СПб. : ДНК, 2000. 528 с.
Апресян Ю. Д. Избранные труды. В 2 т. Т. 1. Лексическая семантика (синонимические средства языка). М. : Школа «Языки русской культуры», Издат. фирма «Восточная литература» РАН, 1995. 472 с.
Филиппова М. Г., Аллахвердов В. М. Конкретизация выбранного смысла в процессе восприятия двойственных изображений // Психология. Журнал высшей школы экономики. 2020. Т. 17, № 2. С. 355–366. https://doi.org/10.17323/1813-8918-2020-2-356–366
Филиппова М. Г., Костина Д. И., Мезенцева М. П. Динамика узнавания незамеченных значений двойственных изображений // Психологический журнал. 2018. Т. 39, № 3. С. 44–56. https://doi.org/10.7868/S0205959218030042
Филиппова М. Г., Морошкина Н. В. Осознаваемая и неосознаваемая многозначность: два вида когнитивного контроля // Сибирский психологический журнал. 2015. № 56. С. 37–55. https://doi.org/10.17223/17267080/56/4
Automatic access of the meanings of ambiguous words in context: Some limitations of knowledge-based processing / M. S. Seidenberg [et. al.] // Cognitive Psychology. 1982. Vol. 14, Is. 4. P. 489–537. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(82)90017-2
Baars B. J. A cognitive theory of consciousness. Cambridge, MA : Cambridge University Press, 1988. 446 p.
Bareither I., Villringer A., Busch N. A. Decreased visual detection during subliminal stimulation // Journal of Vision. 2014. Vol. 14, Is. 12. Art. 20. https://doi.org/10.1167/14.12.20
Barsalou L. W. Ad hoc categories // Memory and Cognition. 1983. Vol. 11. P. 211–217. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196968
Block N. On a Confusion about a Function of Consciousness // The Behavioral and Brain Sciences. 1995. Vol. 18, N. 2. P. 227–247.
Cruse D. A. Lexical Semantics. Cambridge, N. Y. : Cambridge University Press, 1987. 310 p. https://doi.org/10.7146/hjlcb.v1i2.21364
Daza M. T., Ortells J. J., Noguera C. Negative semantic priming from consciously vs. unconsciously perceived single words // Psicologica: International Journal of Methodology and Experimental Psychology. 2007. Vol. 28, N. 2. P. 105-127.
Frings C., Bermeitinger C., Wentura DБ.. Inhibition from blinked category labels: Combining the attentional blink and the semantic priming paradigm // Journal of Cognitive Psychology. 2011. Vol. 23, Is. 4. P. 514-521. https://doi.org/10.1080/20445911.2011.527328
Frings C., Wentura D. Negative Priming with Masked Distractor-Only Prime Trials: Awareness Moderates Negative Priming // Experimental Psychology. 2005. Vol. 52, N. 2. P. 131–139. https://doi.org/10.1027/1618-3169.52.2.131
Gernsbacher M. A., St. John M. F. Modeling Suppression in Lexical Access // On the consequences of meaning selection. Perspectives on resolving lexical ambiguity / ed. by D. S. Gorfein. Washington, DC: APA Publications, 2001. P. 47–65. https://doi.org/10.1037/10459-003
Gernsbacher M. A. Mechanisms that improve referential access // Cognition. 1989. Vol. 32, Is. 2. P. 99–156. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(89)90001-2
Gorfein D. S., Berger S., Bubka A. The selection of homograph meaning: Word association when context changes // Memory & Cognition. 2000. Vol. 28. P. 766–773. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03198411
Gorfein D. S., Brown V. R., DeBiasi C. The activation-selection model of meaning: Explaining why the son comes out after the sun // Memory & Cognition. 2007. Vol. 35. P. 1986–2000. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03192931
Herzog M. H., Kammer T., Scharnowski F. Time Slices: What Is the Duration of a Percept? // PLoS Biology. 2016. Vol. 14, N 6. e1002433. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1002433
Lucas M. Context effects in lexical access: A meta-analysis // Memory & Cognition. 1999. Vol. 27. P. 385–398. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03211535
Nievas F., Mari-Beffa P. Negative priming from the non-selected meaning of the homograph // British journal of psychology. 2002. Vol. 93, Is. 1. P. 47–66. https://doi.org/10.1348/000712602162445
Onifer W., Swinney D. A. Accessing lexical ambiguities during sentence comprehension: Effects of frequency of meaning and contextual bias // Memory & Cognition. 1981. Vol. 9. P. 225–236. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196957
Repetition priming effects from attended vs. ignored single words in a semantic categorization task / J. J. Ortells [et. al.] // Acta Psychologica. 2003. Vol. 114, Is. 2. P. 185-210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2003.08.002
Pilatova O. I., Allakhverdov V. M. Phonetic Ambiguity Resolution: To Be or not to Be Aware // Advances in cognitive research, artificial intelligence and neuroinformatics / ed. by B. M. Velichkovsky, P. M. Balaban, V. L. Ushakov. Cham : Springer Nature, 2021. Vol. 1358. P. 222–229. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-71637-0_26
Rayner K., Pacht J. M., Duffy S. A. Effects of prior encounter and global discourse bias on the processing of lexically ambiguous words: Evidence from eye fixations // Journal of Memory and Language. 1994. Vol. 33, Is. 4. P. 527–544. https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.1994.1025
Schlaghecken F., Eimer M. A central-peripheral asymmetry in masked priming // Perception & Psychophysics. 2000. Vol. 62. P. 1367–1382. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03212139
Selective attention: A reevaluation of the implications of negative priming / B. Milliken [et. al.] // Psychological Review. 1998. Vol. 105, N 2. P. 203–229. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.105.2.203
Simpson G. B., Kellas G. Dynamic contextual processes and lexical access // Resolving semantic ambiguity / ed. by D. S. Gorfein. N. Y. : Springer-Verlag, 1989. P. 40–56. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-3596-5_4
Sumner P., Brandwood T. Oscillations in motor priming: Positive rebound follows the inhibitory phase in the masked prime paradigm // Journal of Motor Behavior. 2008. Vol. 40, Is. 6. P. 484–489. https://doi.org/10.3200/JMBR.40.6.484-490
Tal А., Bar M. The proactive brain and the fate of dead hypotheses // Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience. 2014. Vol. 8, N. 138. Р. 1-6.
Tipper S. P. Does Negative Priming Reflect Inhibitory Mechanisms? A Review and Integration of Conflicting Views // The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A. 2001. Vol. 54, Is. 2. P. 321–343. https://doi.org/10.1080/71375596
Twilley L. C., Dixon P. Meaning resolution processes for words: A parallel independent model // Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. 2000. Vol. 7. P. 49–82. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03210725
Van Petten C., Kutas M. Ambiguous words in context: An event-related potential analysis of the time course of meaning activation // Journal of Memory and Language. 1987. Vol. 26, Is. 2. P. 188–208. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-596X(87)90123-9